I totally agree with Bill in that most of my PC
friends can watch Quicktime. I'm still new at this so
I have bigger priorities than getting a WMV file for
download. Besides, if they don't have Quicktime, their
computers might be to slow to have a good user
experience anyway.

--- Bill Streeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> The problem is that there isn't just one good
> universal format. 
> Flash comes the closest to being a universal format
> for Web viewing, 
> but it doesn't work on most portable devices. If you
> want to be sure 
> that your stuff can be seen on the iPod then choose
> one of the 3 
> formats work with it: MOV, MP4 or M4V (actually
> there are only two 
> formats MP4 and MOV since M4V is just a MP4). Also
> MP4's isn't as 
> universal as you might think. It's not the 'MP3 of
> video.' Windows 
> Media doesn't natively support it. And the MP4 that
> is encoded to 
> play on an iPod won't play on a PSP and vice versa. 
> 
> But then again I've heard reports from some people
> who post in 
> quicktime and WMV that the WMV is downloaded much
> more. But I 
> believe that Andrew from Rocketboom has said that
> the majority of 
> their downloads are Quicktime. Perhaps he'll correct
> me if I'm wrong.
> 
> Fortunately, thanks to the popularity of the iPod
> and it's 
> supporting software iTunes, quicktime isn't all that
> rare on PC's 
> anymore. It's pretty standard in fact--for people
> inclined to 
> consume online media. 
> 
> I currently post iPod compatible MOVs and Flash, but
> that may change 
> soon. The ratio of views that I get is 50 to 1
> favoring quicktime. 
> 
> Bill Streeter
> LO-FI SAINT LOUIS
> www.lofistl.com
> 
> --- In [email protected], "Kent Nichols"
> 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > If you just want one format, go with the iPod
> video format.
> > 
> > We encode, .mov, .m4v, .mp3, flash, and .wmv. 
> With .m4v being 
> about
> > 98% of our viewership.
> > 
> > -K
> > 
> > --- In [email protected],
> "sdorfman.rm" <sdorfman@> 
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello everyone,
> > > 
> > > I'm about to start a video blog.  I'm trying to
> decide on a 
> format
> > to encode my videos in, and 
> > > I was hoping for feedback from the collective
> experience of this 
> list.
> > > 
> > > Here are the goals I'd like to satisfy with my
> video compression 
> choice:
> > > 1. one format for windows and mac (hopefully
> this is possible, 
> I'd
> > rather not have a .mov and 
> > > .wmv of each video because that complicates
> things and takes up
> > double the server space 
> > > and doubles my compression time.  maybe mpeg4
> will satisfy this
> > requirement?  i realize 
> > > windows users can download quicktime, but i'd
> rather use a format
> > that doesn't require 
> > > windows users to have to download software.)
> > > 2. compatible with video ipods
> > > 3. easily compressed with my existing workflow
> Final Cut -> 
> Compressor.
> > > 
> > > What do y'all think?  Am I asking for the moon
> here?
> > > 
> > > Simon
> > >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


http://www.jchtv.com/
A vlog about craic, cocktails, travel, sailing and Philadelphia!

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to