--- In [email protected], "Peter Van Dijck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What is an acceptable response from Veoh? I'm throwing this out for > comments here. > > Here's one I personally could live with: this kind of "re-hosting" > should be opt-in. > > That would mean that: > 1) They remove ALL videos they've spidered and rehosted from their site. > 2) They only keep the ones for feeds that the feed owners have claimed > and where the feed owners have given permission for them to "re-host".
3) For videos claimed, option to remove video series that stops veoh from pulling that feed. > > For me, that makes sense. I don't think Veoh is "evil", I judge > companies by their actions. And this action would tell me: "We > understand why this was wrong, and we're fixing it for real." > > Comments? > > Peter > -- > http://mefeedia.com > > On 4/8/06, Andreas Haugstrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sat, 08 Apr 2006 02:12:39 +0200, John Dowdell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > Little green tickets of money are one way to be selfish. Being the > > > center of attention is another way to be selfish. There are incentives > > > for Slashdot and Digg, just as for any "commercial" entity. > > > > > > You're still not respecting the rights of creators. If someone rips off > > > your website, blog, search history, financial data, does it matter if > > > they get something other than little green tickets in return? > > > > Legally, yes. > > > > -- > > Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen > > <URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ > > > Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology. > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
