Cmon. Lighten up. It was a just a mistake in the first place  :-0)

http://snipurl.com/694s




On Apr 20, 2006, at 7:39 PM, Joshua Kinberg wrote:

> No, its not about attribution.
> Its about falsely portraying people as members of your community when
> they are not. Its about dishonesty and bad business practice.
>
> I do feel that Veoh took the right steps to solve the problem in a
> timely fashion, but I do not believe they had the right intentions in
> the first place.
>
> -Josh
>
>
> On 4/20/06, Michael Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> it's still more about the attribution more than anything else....
>>
>> mefeedia "aquires" feeds too.  i dont have a problem with that.  do
>> you?
>>
>> the attribution issue has been addressed.  i am satisfied.  are you?
>>
>> sull
>>
>> On 4/20/06, Joshua Kinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
>>>
>> Its not just that the work is a derivative, or that its a full clip
>> rather than a "preview" -- the bigger issue for me is that Veoh used
>> vloggers and their content to make it seem as though they had a
>> growing and vibrant community, people who've signed up, agreed to
>> terms of service, and were participants in the Veoh community. This
>> was not true. They took people's content and made bogus profiles for
>> them. They forced "users" into an opt out situation when they had
>> never in fact opted in. This is dishonest.
>>
>> -josh
>>
>>
>> On 4/20/06, Markus Sandy < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> exactly!!!
>>>
>>>
>>> Michael Verdi wrote:
>>> For many videobloggers the previews were long enough to be the
>>> complete
>>> work.
>>>
>>>
>>> --



YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to