Hello Heath,

On 12/4/06, Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You hit upon what I think is the missing factor in this thread....the
>  viewers.....and that was whom I was talking about when I started this
>  thread, the average joe or jane who goes online to view videos, when
>  they go online they think YouTube because that is all that they have
>  heard, with all respects to Yahoo's buyout of Broadcast.com in 1999,
>  who in the general public heard of Broadcast.com prior to Yahoo
>  buying them out?  I would venture a small handful.  It is the general
>  public I talk about a lot when I think about these things....

In 1999... I don't think the "general public" was really on the web
yet.  So that's probably not a good way to judge it.

Back then, Broadcast.com was known by the people who were on the Web
at that time.


(Wow... 1999... I was still in University.)


See ya

>
>  To the average person, the one who knows nothing of RSS feeds,
>  subscribing to blogs, heck they don't even know what a blog is,
>  honestly most don't.  Come to Cincinnati, stop 10 people random on
>  the street, I bet 1 maybe 2 have heard of RSS or a blog...but ask
>  them if they have heard of YouTube?  I would bet it's half...(sure
>  that is just a guess, I suppose I will have to go downtown with my
>  camera and ask them)
>
>  That doesn't mean I think YouTube is the best place for videos, I
>  don't, personaly I want people to come to my site.  But that's me,
>  all I can do is one step at a time try and teach people the
>  differance and why sites like Blip are better.
>
>  But the average joe wants to turn on the tv and look at a guide and
>  channel surf, and YT is good for that, for better for worse....
>
>  Heath
>  http://batmangeek7.blogspot.com
>
>  --- In [email protected], "Mark Day" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>  wrote:
>  >
>  > Ha! Now I have your attention.... (ahem)
>  >
>  > My comments were summarising some general sentiments that I seem to
>  have
>  > noticed rather than intended to point to anyone in particular.
>  >
>  > I would agree with Mike that there is a "broader dialogue" outside
>  of
>  > YouTube which YouTubers who never leave the walled garden don't
>  participate
>  > in.  But it's also true that there's a large and vibrant dialogue
>  going on
>  > *within* YouTube which (I'm generalizing...).  Now, to be fair, a
>  lot of
>  > that dialogue is YouTubers talking to other YouTubers about
>  YouTubey things
>  > (as opposed to, say, videobloggers talking to video bloggers about
>  video
>  > bloggy things...). But still.
>  >
>  > I guess having one foot in one camp and a toe dipped tentatively in
>  the
>  > other (thanks in no small part to Blip.tv, about whom i cannot say
>  enough
>  > etc.....) I am just seeing what looks (to my superficial eyes) to
>  be some
>  > small patches of itchy irony.
>  >
>  > As for the "destination blog/vlog" vs. the live journal blog
>  analogy.... I
>  > agree that the 'top tier' blogs (in something of a self perpetuating
>  > system...) sit above the proletariat (ahem), and the same could be
>  true for
>  > video blogs.   Would I like to migrate all my subscribers somewhere
>  I could
>  > monetize my work? Sure.  Do I think, at this point, that there are
>  enough of
>  > them, and that enough of them would follow to make a tactical
>  withdrawal
>  > from YouTube worth my while?  Probably not.  Perhaps Malcolm
>  Gladwell could
>  > identify the dozen people who would have to leave YouTube for a
>  Tipping
>  > Point style collapse, but I fear I'm not one of them...
>  >
>  > Am I going to be tarred by the bush of "YouTuber" as my content
>  migrates
>  > other places?  It may be too late for that.  Or it may not.
>  > One thing I think is interesting is that I read a lot about how the
>  internet
>  > is increasingly "invisible" (ie taken for granted) by the current
>  > generation, with media distinctions essentially blurring.  And I'm
>  reading
>  > here that, if anything, more media distinctions are what's called
>  for. Hmmm.
>  >
>  > Meanwhile, I do actually sort of understand what an RSS feed does.
>  I can't
>  > for the effing life of me figure out what "feedburning" it will do.
>  > Although anything involving fire is always fun.
>  >
>  > Cheers
>  >
>  > MD
>  > www.youtube.com/markdaycomedy
>  > http://markdaycomedy.blip.tv/
>  > & etc. etc.


-- 
    Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.

    charles @ reptile.ca
    supercanadian @ gmail.com

    developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/
___________________________________________________________________________
 Make Television                                http://maketelevision.com/

___________________________________________________________________________
 Cars, Motorcycles, Trucks, and Racing...           http://tirebiterz.com/

Reply via email to