This is way too organized for a mid 90's meeting of college Democrats. (please send all hate mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
I still haven't figured out why it would ever matter to me if someone referred to it as a video blog, a vlog or a show. And I think that personal connection (as in the comment "my site" in an earlier post) has a lot to do with this constant discussion. How does the individual classify him or herself and how does the end viewer classify him or her? Does it do someone harm to be referred to as a vlogger? As a video content producer? As a enter your name of choice here? Does it somehow enhance the experience or bring someone more cache to be called a vlogger, or content producer, et.al? Again, hate mail goes to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Non hate mail goes there as well. Tony Katz http://www.talkshowonthego.com http://www.vnetworks.tv --- In [email protected], "Mike Hudack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I feel like I'm eavesdropping at a mid-90s meeting of the College > Democrats. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Howell > > Sent: Saturday, December 09, 2006 4:48 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: [videoblogging] Re: vlog > > > > --- In [email protected], andrew michael baron > > <andrew@> wrote: > > > > > > You vlogger, you. > > > > > > :P > > > > > > > That was just plain mean. *dammit* :P > > > > So, ok...let me get this straight. > > > > Is there is a push to define all websites with video content > > on them as a "vlog" and the creator/s of the site are > > "vloggers"? Or, are there certain and specific requirements > > that dictate that one site is a vlog and one site is a > > website with video? > > > > Maybe, I joined the wrong Yahoo group? Does anyone know if > > there is a Yahoo group for web video content creators? > > > > David > > http://www.davidhowellstudios.com > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > >
