Andrew vs. Amanda, Part 9,452,953: When Blogging It Ain't Enough On 12/15/06, andrew michael baron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Gary, no need. I think Sul just meant he didn't want people to be > antagonistic with each other. > > My intent is to provide feedback that will hopefully be useful to > others. > > There is a direction I was going with this and it has to do with > business practices. Because everyone in the Amanda camp have done > their best to silence the discussion, I posted it to my blog - you > and they seem to be overly resistant to considering this worthwhile > topic. > http://www.dembot.com/011937.html > > The other part of the discussion which I have yet to begin is also > very important and it has to do with the relationships of band members. > > Videoblogs are a lot like bands and the collaboration between > partners leads to a hell of a lot of strife for many people. > > Amanda chose to make ours public when she posted her video and began > attacking me on her blog and to the press. > > Thus, it's a perfect opportunity to explore and share the experience > for the sake of preventing others from having to go through this. > > People go though this all the time but its usually behind closed > doors so no one learns from mistakes and thus progression in the > favor of independents becomes stifled. > > I did not understand the importance of this until it was already > overwhelming. > > There are a lot of people that start working on a project - > especially duos - and they really need to do some things to > anticipate the future, good or bad. > > On Dec 15, 2006, at 10:03 AM, Gary Short wrote: > > > As a mod asked everyone to stop posting on this thread (you must > > have missed > > that) I'll not respond here, but if you wish to continue this > > discussion please > > feel free to contact me off list. > > > > Cheers, > > Gary > > http://www.garyshort.org/ > > > > http://www.carnoustiegolflinks.co.uk/vlog/ > > > > From: [email protected] <videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com> > > [mailto:[email protected] <videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com>] > On > > Behalf Of andrew michael baron > > Sent: 15 December 2006 14:33 > > To: [email protected] <videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com> > > Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: OOoh, Amanda's Up! > > > > Gary, whats the point of telling me Im getting on your nerves? You > > are doing exactly what Andrew Congdon did and I have no problem > > speaking up about it and defending myself. > > > > I think I provided a well rounded argument for disucssion about the > > cost of doing business when merging established media and new media. > > > > When Andrew Congdon chimed in to "refute" my contribution to this > > group by saying "Sour Grapes", I think this shows dolt behavior. > > > > I think this is now your unfortunate oversight. > > > > Your comments should have been directed at him. > > > > > So what was your idea exactly? > > > > Why dont you go back and read the post instead of participating in > > accusing me of "being such a baby" and shooting me down for the > > contributions I give to this field, big or small. > > > > Andrew, you are really starting to get on my nerves now with this > > carping; > > > > Give me a brea > > > > it is > > so childish, it's like listening to my kids arguing over who has been > > given the > > most veg and how it's soooo unfair. For goodness sake stop being such > > a baby. > > > > Huh? > > > > The sad fact of business is that people come together, they do great > > work and > > sometimes they disagree and go their own way - that's life Andrew, > > get over it. > > The thing is there is no doubt you have talent, but you are not > > encouraging > > anyone to reach out to you with a new business idea/partnership with > > this > > behavior. People will be reading these outbursts of yours and > > saying to > > themselves, "is this what it is like if it doesn't work out?" and > > they'll be > > giving you a big body swerve. > > > > While we are on the subject, stop pretending that Rocketboom was some > > huge > > intellectual breakthrough on your part, that it was all your > > wonderful idea. > > What utter nonsense. Entertaining though Rocketboom was (and still > > is) there > > wasn't a single new idea there. I mean, taking a look at the more > > quirky aspects > > of the news? Been done. Fronting the show with a good looking, > > intelligent and > > charismatic woman. Been done. Hosting the show as a video cast for > > download? > > Been done. So what was your idea exactly? > > > > Like I said though, I don't want to pour oil on troubled waters, as I > > think we > > are all tired of hearing about it - just please, get over yourself > > will you? > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > >
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
