Den 04.01.2007 kl. 16:20 skrev Mike Hudack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > That's correct. The problem is that we do want to be picky. We want to > allow people to use VPIP to play back videos hosted on blip, but we > don't want to allow them to use the MyHeavy player on MyHeavy.com > (unless it's the content creator themselves making that decision, in > which case it's OK). Make sense? The issue here is that it's always > case-by-case, and I challenge you to create rewrite rules that don't > include a narrow whitelisting of things like VPIP (which don't have > usable user-agent reporting anyway).
Not to mention that Referer and User Agent headers are arbitrary and it would be less than trivial for a myheavy.com site to identify itself as blip.tv or vPIP respectively. If it wanted to. -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen <URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ >
