We've already defined our own namespace for several things, and we'll continue to "embrace and extend" RSS in a way that doesn't break anything, at least for the benefit of our partners and people who write software designed to work with blip RSS feeds when no alternative standards exist.
That isn't the right approach for these kind of standards, and I still maintain that it's premature to develop such standards when the ones we already have aren't themselves being meaningfully parsed and respected. > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kath O'Donnell > Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 8:54 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: MyHeavy.com, a call for > discussion on proper re-vlogging ettiquette > > ahh. namespaces. for extending rss spec. > is that an option - for blip or the videoblogging community > to define it's own namespaces then work with other > aggregators so they support them also? > > http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification#extendingRss > http://www.disobey.com/detergent/2002/extendingrss2/ > > > > On 1/6/07, Kath O'Donnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > have an opt-out also for users to opt out of whole sites eg heavy > > opt-out="heavy.com" > > > > > > On 1/6/07, Kath O'Donnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > you almost need a 'taste' attribute with an opt-in override (user > > > based in addition to site) in the rss feed that the > user/creator can > > > fillin when they post their work &/or as a sitewide > option (so if u > > > added another optin u wouldn't need to go back an update all the > > > existing postings) licence= +non_commercial > +non_dating_site +opt-in="fireant" > > > +opt-in="itunes" > > > > > > > > > > > -- > http://www.aliak.com > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > >
