On 1/11/07, Steve Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Oh yeah and the supreme arrongance of Apple winds me up - just why did > they think they could get away with using the name iPhone when its > already been trademarked?
I'm an Apple fan, but also felt the same way. It seemed so blatant, so ridiculous, I was similarly confident that Cisco would have the rare opportunity to prevail over Apple and make the company eat a little humble pie. But it turns out, Cisco may have shot itself in the foot: http://blogs.zdnet.com/Burnette/?p=236 You know what? It'd be worth Apple losing the case anyway. Just seeing that fake product box makes it all worth it. Digg It! http://www.digg.com/tech_news/iPhonegate_Cisco_s_sneaky_sticker Ryan
