I would say this problem is in part due to the fact that 'can they sell or license your video' is worded unclearly, does a yes mean yes to both sell and license, or just license? It would be better if that were clearer.
I welcome warmly any guides or other things that can spread clarity on these issues, but unfortunately the devil is in the detail and I guess its easy to get it slightly wrong. Also theres a mistake in the google section, it mentions yahoo! Cheers Steve of Elbows --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Mike Hudack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'd actually like to apologize for my overly hasy reaction. I would just like to discuss the issue of content sales, ads (which are opt-in) and "wide reuse" rights. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com <videoblogging@yahoogroups.com> > To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com <videoblogging@yahoogroups.com>; JD Lasica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thu Jan 18 14:06:48 2007 > Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Terms of Service post > > On 1/18/07, Mike Hudack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Fyi, this inaccurately describes blip's tos. Its wrong on several points, including extremely major ones. We do not, for instance, have the right to resell our users' work without express user permission and would never do such a thing. > > Im cc'ing JD on this email so he can respond. > > jay > > > -- > Here I am.... > http://jaydedman.com > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
