Hi sull and all,

1) MediaRSS is what is preferred and chosen above alternatives b/c 
that is the standard. It would be great if all blogging platforms, 
feed providers, hosting providers, et all use the media:thumbnail 
standard. :)

2) However, since there are platforms that do NOT support 
media:thumbnail, what Mike is proposing is that videobloggers could 
use 
the <img src="" rel=thumbnail> as an alternative...

Hope that clarifies. Would be great for videobloggers to always have 
beautiful thumbs throughout the vlogosphere. :)

-Frank

Frank Sinton
CEO, Mefeedia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Y: fsinton
Skype: fsinton

http://www.mefeedia.com - Find, Watch, and Share great videoblogs 
and podcasts.
Our blog: http://mefeedia.com/blog
 

--- In [email protected], sull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Perhaps andreas could suggest and alternative to "rel"
> 
> 
> I would hope and assume that Andreas would likewise stress the use 
of
> media:thumbnail.
> 
> Ok, a discussion about mediaRSS came up here months ago and I 
chimed in.
> It involved mediaRSS and Drupal.  I think it was the thread that 
Mike Hudack
> said that we would all be better off if Drupal didnt exist (though 
I hear
> there is a blip drupal plugin coming out ;).
> Anyway, Mike Meiser... you had said something to the effect that 
mediaRSS
> has failed us (videobloggers).
> I disagreed and simply pointed out that the culture is catching up 
with the
> need and usefulness of mediaRSS.
> 
> So here we are again talking about different ways to do things 
instead of
> using what took months to spec out by an open group initiated by 
yahoo
> (andreas included).  I understand the angle you are looking at 
this... I
> do.
> But I dont want the emphasis to be misplaced entirely away from 
furthering
> support of mediaRSS.
> 
> Now I wont deny the idea to stick in a rel or class=thumbnail.  I 
am fine
> with such semantics.  But I just want to stress to you that if 
anyone is
> going to become a voice, collective or not, to encourage 
videobloggers to
> markup their posts in a way that defines a thumbnail.... and you 
want to get
> hundreds and thousands of people doing this.... then how can we 
not put
> efforts into getting media:thumbnail to be more widely used in 
conjunction
> with your proposal? That's all I am suggesting here.  A 
prioritzation of
> sorts.  Just focusing on rel or class markup can even be a step 
backward to
> getting mediaRSS more widely used.  I'd like to avoid that.
> 
> Alright so most people use Wordpress, correct?  I typically do not 
but since
> it is popular, I am going to reiterate what I mentioned months ago 
about how
> to use wordpress custom fields to output mediaRSS... no plugin 
needed.  But
> I will also search for nicer plugins instead of modifying the WP 
code.
> 
> Drafting this... be right back ;)
> 
> Back.
> 
> http://www.vastmachine.com/blog/?p=4
> 
> Alright, i spent 10 minutes.  one-click install of wordpress from 
dreamhost.
> added a custom field during my first post called 'thumbnail' and 
added a url
> to image.
> edited wp-rss2.php with a few new lines of code.
> 
> http://www.vastmachine.com/blog/?feed=rss2
> 
> view source.  media:thumbnail is in there.
> 
> validates:
> <
> http://feedvalidator.org/check.cgi?url=http%3A%2F%
2Fwww.vastmachine.com%2Fblog%2F%3Ffeed%3Drss2
> >
> 
> Not so hard.  I attached the wp-rss2.php to that post.  Id rather 
tell
> wordpress vloggers to try this before telling them to markup their 
posts
> with thumbnail semantics.  but both are good to do.  thumbs are 
important.
> no doubt.
> 
> sull
> 
> On 2/9/07, Mike Meiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >   On 2/9/07, billshackelford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<bshackelford%
40gmail.com>>
> > wrote:
> > > I agree.. mediaRSS already exists and is supported by many.
> > >
> > > --- In [email protected] <videoblogging%
40yahoogroups.com>,
> > sull <sulleleven@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > nah.
> > > > encourage mediaRSS spec for thumbnails.
> > > >
> > > > and consider using blip feeds (blip users).
> > > >
> > > > sull
> > > >
> >
> > You're both COMPLETELY missing the point.
> >
> > This is NOT an alternative to mediaRSS. It's not an either or 
thing.
> > When you're composing a blog post you can't very well mark 
something
> > up in mediaRSS because you can only markup mediaRSS if you're 
actually
> > coding your own RSS feeds. You need a way to be able to TELL
> > wordpress... or feedburner or whatever is creating your RSS 
feed...
> > heh this image, it is the thumbnail, please put it in the 
thumbnail
> > field of the RSS feed.
> >
> > Secondly... Sull, people cannot just go and use their blip feeds
> > instead of their feedburner feeds. Because their blogs are far 
more
> > than just videos from blip... their blogs contain text posts, and
> > blogged posts from flickr, and posts that are reblogged from 
others.
> > That makes about as much sense as telling them just to use their
> > delicious feed, or flickr feed instead of their blog.
> >
> > Maybe my post was to long or something, but I'm sort of 
disapointed in
> > the responses.
> >
> > Other than the fact that there is no "rel" atribute to <img> 
there's
> > no reason not to do this.
> >
> > Perhaps andreas could suggest and alternative to "rel", or 
perhaps I'd
> > like to suggest playing the devils advocate, does it really 
matter if
> > there's no rel attribute to <img src>? What's wrong with 
extending
> > it? It guarantees there will be no conflicts, and it's in keeping
> > with other standards like relTag, relNoFollow, relEnclosure and 
many
> > others.
> >
> > Again just to play devils advocate... but what's wrong with 
extending
> > HTML with a rel standard?
> >
> > If that is evil incarnate what other choices do we have?
> >
> > class="media-thumbnail" ?
> >
> > I think this is already getting to convoluted... we need 
something the
> > everyday people can understand... getting people to make the 
jump from
> > rel= to class= is a big step to ask thousands of people to 
remember...
> > these are not coders they're bloggers.
> >
> > -Mike
> > mefeedia.com
> > mmeiser.com/blog
> >
> >
> > > >
> > > > On 2/8/07, Mike Meiser <groups-yahoo-com@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Yeah, maybe we should skip the whole overriding media 
microfotmat
> > > > > thing...
> > > > > and in true microformats style solve the simplest and most 
necissary
> > > > > problem
> > > > > first.
> > > > >
> > > > > I.E. <img src="" rel=thumbnail>
> > > > >
> > > > > It's actually hard for me to believe people aren't 
actually using
> > this
> > > > > somewhere in the RSS-o-sphere. Has anyone seen anything.
> > > > >
> > > > > It perfectly in keeping with other specs like rel=tag,
> > rel=enclosure,
> > > > > rel=payment and a host of others.
> > > > >
> > > > > It will also work with perfectly with other forms of media 
feeds
> > like
> > > > > audio,
> > > > > and photocasts as well. It's a univeral element.
> > > > >
> > > > > Any objections to this?
> > > > >
> > > > > -Mike
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 2/8/07, duthied2004 <duthied@ <duthied%40gmail.com>> 
wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hey all.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I've been out of the loop on this list for some time and 
have
> > tried to
> > > > > > catch up on this, so forgive me if stuff has been 
said/asked
> > > before....
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But, I'd love to hear how people are setting the 
thumbnails for
> > their
> > > > > > entries....do you use mediarss on your site, is it only 
in the
> > > > > > 'description' of the post, in a thumbnail element in the 
item
> > > > > > elements? As Mike mentioned it's a hodge-podge currently.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Glad to see the same names on here still, as well as 
many more new
> > > ones.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Devlon
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In [email protected]<videoblogging%
40yahoogroups.com>
> > > <videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com>,
> > > > > groups-yahoo-com@ wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > There is also a larger issue Bill which Josh touched 
on.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The general problem is that while 90% (or some 
otherwise very
> > hight
> > > > > > > percent of vloggers) have thumbnails in their posts 
they are not
> > > > > > > "semantically" specified. This is to say they are not 
specified
> > in
> > > > > > > standard way which can be recognized by aggregators 
and search
> > sites
> > > > > > > like Fireant, vlogdi, mefeedia and others. For 
example...
> > eclosures
> > > > > > > can be specified in your blog post among other ways by 
a
> > microformat
> > > > > > > standard "rel=enclosure". There is no standards for 
huge amounts
> > of
> > > > > > > supporting meta infromation like thumbnails, i.e. 
there is no
> > > > > > > "rel=thumnail".
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > We're working on mechanisms not only to better identify
> > thumbnails
> > > in
> > > > > > > blog posts, among other things, by creating a new media
> > Microformat.
> > > > > > > It should not only have a tremendous immediate impact 
for people
> > who
> > > > > > > use services like blip, feedburner, mefeedia, fireant 
and
> > others,
> > > but
> > > > > > > it should also put this control into YOUR hands if you 
like when
> > > > > > > you're writing a blog post.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > P.S. Josh, I hope you'll collaborate on this media 
microformat
> > as
> > > well
> > > > > > > as sharing other ideas on sharing thumbnail 
information.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Peace,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -Mike
> > > > > > > mmeiser.com/blog
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 1/19/07, Peter Van Dijck <petervandijck@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > Hey Josh, I haven't checked that feature in like a 
year, so it
> > may
> > > > > > have
> > > > > > > > stopped working.. let Frank know if you have any 
questions
> > about
> > > > > > that, I'm
> > > > > > > > sure he'd be happy to get it running again.. all my 
fault!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Peter
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 1/19/07, Joshua Kinberg <jkinberg@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hi Bill,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > We're currently working on this issue and plan to 
have a big
> > new
> > > > > > > > > release of the FireAnt website in February. This 
new release
> > > will
> > > > > > > > > support the Media RSS namespace for thumbnails.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Currently, we can grab thumbnails from blog posts 
if they
> > are
> > > > > > included
> > > > > > > > > in the link to the video enclosure file like this:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > <a href="http://link/to/video.mov"; 
rel="enclosure"><img
> > > > > > > > > src="http://link/to/thumbnail/image.jpg"; /></a>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > We also have the ability to get thumbnail images 
from
> > MeFeedia,
> > > > > > but it
> > > > > > > > > seems that MeFeedia may have disabled this feature.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hope that helps explain... please stay tuned for 
our new
> > website
> > > > > > > > > update that will address this along with many 
other bug
> > fixes
> > > > > > and new
> > > > > > > > > features.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > > > Josh
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > http://FireAnt.tv
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 1/19/07, billshackelford
> > > > > > > > <bshackelford@<bshackelford%40gmail.com>>
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > My videos do not have thumbnails on FireAnt. It 
seems they
> > do
> > > > > not
> > > > > > > > > utilize the Yahoo Media
> > > > > > > > > > RSS namespace attributes. Is there a reason why? 
If there
> > is a
> > > > > > legal
> > > > > > > > > reason.. why don't they
> > > > > > > > > > just come up with their own namespace?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I believe I read something about FireAnt getting
> > thumbnails
> > > from
> > > > > > > > > Mefeedia but my
> > > > > > > > > > thumbnails show up Mefeedia fine.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Does anyone know if there is something I can do 
to have my
> > > > > > thumbnails
> > > > > > > > > show up on FireAnt?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Here is my channel on FireAnt:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > billshackelford.com podcast
> > > > > > > > > > http://fireant.tv/directory/channel/22981
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > Find 10000s of videoblogs and podcasts at 
http://mefeedia.com
> > > > > > > > my blog: http://poorbuthappy.com/ease/
> > > > > > > > my job: http://petervandijck.net
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Sull
> > > > http://vlogdir.com (a project)
> > > > http://SpreadTheMedia.org (my blog)
> > > > http://interdigitate.com (otherly)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Sull
> http://vlogdir.com (a project)
> http://SpreadTheMedia.org (my blog)
> http://interdigitate.com (otherly)
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>


Reply via email to