That's not entirely true, YT itself is not uploading the clips, the 
users are.  Now I understand it's a fine line and I am not defending 
the practice of copyrighted clips on YT.  But they do remove clips once 
they have been notified, that is a fact.  Now does it stop people from 
uploading clips?  Of course not.  That is why they (big media) is 
fighting so hard for DRM, which is another story for another day.  YT 
may have it's fault but I have to say that they have been extremely 
proactive in trying to secure content and partner with studios.

My guess is that they money Viacom wanted up front was so outragous the 
Google balked and now they are suing them.  That is why I said it will 
only get worse.  the sums that they are asking for effectly guarentees 
that companies like YT can not make a profit from advertising, because 
what they would have to charge in turn for said advertising no one 
could afford.

The whole attitude of the RIAA and these media companies right now 
is, "OK, we realize that people are going to pirate our stuff so to 
make up for it, you need to give us X amount of dollars for the 
privlage of showing our stuff  AND Y sum to make up for those nasty 
pirates".  They are forceing these start ups to assume the risk, for 
their own failing.....it's silly.....but it will happen.  And that will 
be bad for all of us.

Look at how much you spend each month on re-occuring bills right now, 
that are not directly related to your living expenses...

phone bill, cell bill, cable bill, a fee for this, a fee for 
that....think about it.....

Heath
http://batmangeek7.blogspot.com

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Bill Cammack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>

> 
> That's absolutely right.  There's no reason that YouTube should have
> been able to get away with pirating everything under the sun and
> essentially ignoring requests of the original content creators to
> remove their materials from their site.  It's the exact same >argument
> that's been brought up here over and over about sites being able to
> aggregate our content sans repercussion.  
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to