On 4/30/07, Jan McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can we not ask to have this particular troll blocked from dicking with the
> article?

Yes, there is user blocking. I'm still trying to figure it out, any
help would be greatly appreciated. The best course to getting anything
done I can find is talking to admins. Ultimately it's they who have to
ban a user.

> Alternatively, if we - as a group - monitor and replace the proper text with
> enthusiasm, perhaps we can wear him down.

Rupert suggested this too.  It's unlikely we would wear him down, but
if we were to continually revert his deletes where it is reasonable,
which is to say engage him in a reversion war the absurdity would
probably attract the desired response from admins.

-Mike

> Jan
>
> On 4/30/07, Rupert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > :) funny man
> >
> > As long as we're not being like the townsfolk in Bad Day at Black Rock.
> >
> > Irina, I know what you mean, but locking up the article would be a
> > loss, too.  better to try and let it stay open and persuade this
> > Patrick Delongchamp idiot to stop wrecking it.
> >
> > Rupert
> >
> > On 30 Apr 2007, at 10:05, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen wrote:
> >
> > Den 30.04.2007 kl. 10:51 skrev Rupert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > > At the moment, it's one-on-one with Meiser and this idiot. Let's not
> > > be like the townsfolk in High Noon, leaving him to tackle it alone.
> > > Let's be like the slaves in Spartacus!
> >
> > Or like Clint Eastwood in Unforgiven. Old, bitter and generally
> > unwilling
> > until someone shoots your best friend dead and puts his body on
> > display on
> > Main Street.
> >
> > --
> > Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
> > <URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> The Faux Press - better than real
> http://fauxpress.blogspot.com
> http://twitter.com/fauxpress
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to