yes, scoble knows

On 6/18/07, David Howell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>   I assume that Scoble knows what's going on with this however he is
> refusing to say anything online about it...
>
>
> http://blogumentary.typepad.com/chuck/2007/06/podtech_please_.html#comments
>
> Ah what a wicked web we weave...
>
> I'm a gittin some popcorn to watch this one play out!
>
> David
> http://www.davidhowellstudios.com
>
> --- In [email protected] <videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com>,
> "schlomo rabinowitz"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > This smells like so much Business As Usual, that its a perfect news
> piece
> > for a Monday at the office.... all the way down to the typical
> buck-passing
> > to Podtech's accounting dept.
> >
> > The more things change, the more they stay the same.
> >
> > There are a bunch of people on this list who get funding from
> Podtech-- is
> > this a typical reflection of how they work?
> >
> > Schlomo
> > http://schlomolog.blogspot.com
> > http://weknowhow.tv
> > http://winkshow.com
> > http://hatfactory.net
> >
> >
> > --- In [email protected] 
> > <videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com><videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com>,
> > "Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen"
> >
> > > <solitude@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Den 18.06.2007 kl. 19:58 skrev Michael Verdi <michaelverdi@>:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> http://www.lanbui.com/blog/2007/05/creative-commons-podtechnet-doesnt.html
> > > >
> > > > Collections agency
> > > > then
> > > > Small claims court
> > > >
> > > > Fucking morons. Lan, I hoped you marked up your regular prices to
> > > account
> > > > for them being assholes when you sent your invoice.
> > > >
> > > > As Tim points out in the comments PodTech needs permission for Casey
> > > as
> > > > well (this isn't a news story, but regular advertising).
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
> > > > <URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>  
>



-- 
http://geekentertainment.tv


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to