Well to try to be fair, I suppose this is one of the downsides of working for companies, its probably not condusive to being able to speak freely, who knows whats going on in terms of podtech presenting their case, who will be responsible for doing that, what their side of the story is.
Its pretty obvious that my personal opinions cause me to be rather harsh about most companies and those who become embroiled in the company way of doing things. Occasionally I try to balance this with a more rational attempt to see the other side, but it sure is hard when the other side of the story is unavailable. Certainly I cant rightly point finger of blame at any particular human associated with podtech, definately not at this stage, and my earlier rant about Furrier interview is really just me getting all ranty about my personal dislike of advertising culture and all that goes with it. Anyway I dunno why Im stil posting my opinions here when everyone is probably rather sick of them and it feels like Ive been sent to coventry since my rage against the wikipedia incident. Which is ironic as I live so close to the real Coventry. And why am I going on about my own personal (mis)conceptions of a situation unrelated, as if anyone cares, we reap what we sow, so I deserve what I get I guess. Elbows and his long and dull attack history which has ultimately claimed only himself as victim, wibble waffle blurg. This brain fart of a message is licensed under a non-creative-ranting-ignore-alike 3.45 UK version license. Steve Elbows --- In [email protected], "David Howell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I assume that Scoble knows what's going on with this however he is > refusing to say anything online about it... > > http://blogumentary.typepad.com/chuck/2007/06/podtech_please_.html#comments > > Ah what a wicked web we weave... > > I'm a gittin some popcorn to watch this one play out! > > David > http://www.davidhowellstudios.com > > > > --- In [email protected], "schlomo rabinowitz" > <schlomo@> wrote: > > > > This smells like so much Business As Usual, that its a perfect news > piece > > for a Monday at the office.... all the way down to the typical > buck-passing > > to Podtech's accounting dept. > > > > The more things change, the more they stay the same. > > > > There are a bunch of people on this list who get funding from > Podtech-- is > > this a typical reflection of how they work? > > > > Schlomo > > http://schlomolog.blogspot.com > > http://weknowhow.tv > > http://winkshow.com > > http://hatfactory.net > > > > > > --- In [email protected] <videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com>, > > "Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen" > > > > > <solitude@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Den 18.06.2007 kl. 19:58 skrev Michael Verdi <michaelverdi@>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.lanbui.com/blog/2007/05/creative-commons-podtechnet-doesnt.html > > > > > > > > Collections agency > > > > then > > > > Small claims court > > > > > > > > Fucking morons. Lan, I hoped you marked up your regular prices to > > > account > > > > for them being assholes when you sent your invoice. > > > > > > > > As Tim points out in the comments PodTech needs permission for Casey > > > as > > > > well (this isn't a news story, but regular advertising). > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen > > > > <URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > >
