Hey David,

I use the Xacti C40 for my vlog now. I use to use both a Camcorder and
the Xacti, but now just the Xacti.

I wish my model had a mic port. 
I wish the built in mic wasn't on the back of the viewing screen. 
I'm very happy with the quality I get out of such a small package.
I did add a wide-angle lens to get the effect So don't take the view
as what you'd expect out of the box on your Xacti.

Here's some talk about the Xacti:
http://mmmmmoon.blogspot.com/search/label/Xacti

If you take a look at my last 4 vlogs, you'll get samples of
Outdoor-sunny, outdoor-early evening, outdoor in the Cabana and
fireworks while using a tripod. The latest ones are compressed using
the h.264 compression...just fyi.

Mike
http://vlog.mikemoon.net



--- In [email protected], "David Meade" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> I've been thinking about the Xacti cameras lately (or others of similar
> design), and have been trying to read up on them online. 
Unfortunately all
> the user reviews usually have the same problems:
> 
>  1) EXTREME (polar opposite) opinions on video quality in the same forum
>  2) No actual video to back up either opinion :-P
> 
> I know a lot of folks here use Xacti or similar form factor cameras
... but
> we don't often know the camera being used by someone when we watch their
> vlog ...
> 
> So, I was wondering if some folks with various models of xacti (or
similar
> form factor) cameras could reply here with which model you use, and
a link
> to an example video.
> 
> I'm basically trying to see the actual end result video from the various
> models.  Indoor lighting vs outdoor, color quality, etc etc etc  But
if you
> want to include other information such as battery life / gripes /etc
that
> would be most welcome as well. :-)
> 
> I've read on this list that some people are disappointed with the sound
> these cameras capture ... I'm wondering how it compares to using
internal
> mics on other cameras though ... worse than normal or just the standard
> "internal mics suck"?
> 
> 
> Thanks in advance,
>  - Dave
> 
> -- 
> http://www.DavidMeade.com
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>


Reply via email to