Ah. Sorry, I didn't realize simple statements like that in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary was sufficient. My bad.
I am the King of England. - Dave On 7/24/07, John Furrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I understand. > > ________________________________ > From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of David Meade > Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 1:05 PM > To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: irina gone > > > On 7/24/07, John Furrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:john%40podtech.net>> > wrote: > > > > Not true Kent. I responded immediately to Lan and what was said shall > > remain private. It is over and we fully respect CC and producers work. > > > > I think what you keep failing to understand, John, is that your issue WITH > LAN is over .... your issue WITH THE COMMUNITY as to how it ended is NOT. > > You can't wash away one with the other, and you cant pretend they are the > same and expect the community to buy it. > > Saying "the reason we didn't have to pay Lan what he asked after we stole > his stuff is private" isn't going to relieve concerns by content producers > as to if PodTech respects the true ownership of the content. Why would we > as content producers ever choose to trust such a company with our work > ever > again? > > Your issue with Lan may be over, but your issue with the community is not > ... and your constant refusal to understand the difference between the two > is not painting PodTech in the best of lights. > > If you want the issue with the community to be over, you're going to have > to > a) stop confusing the two and b) talk to the community about the issue > that > remains. Moving discussions off list and outside the view of the community > isn't going to help you do that. > > "trust me, you don't know the whole story" sounds like a load of crap to > me > ... either Lan owned the image or he didn't. You've acknowledged that he > did. And happily for you Lan has let you off the hook .... but PodTech > has yet to address THE COMMUNITY as to why it felt it didn't have to pay > Lan > what he asked even after he negotiated down from his first invoice. > > - Dave > > -- > http://www.DavidMeade.com > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > -- http://www.DavidMeade.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
