> The emphasis on financial gain is extremely weird and pretty much > unjustifiable. I can see > lots of reasons why you need to discriminate between someone who works (for > love, > money, or bee in bonnet) as a journalist and someone who doess not. Not all > bloggers > qualify as journalists (citizen or otherwise) and not all need or deserve to > be protected by > a journalist's shield. But many do and they are being very deliberately > excluded here. > Are there any other fields where if you don't earn your living from > something you have > fewer rights?
I wonder what a better way to word it would be. Lets take Josh Wolf as an example. how should it be worded to have included him? Jay -- http://jaydedman.com 917 371 6790 Video: http://ryanishungry.com Twitter: http://tinyurl.com/2aodyc RSS: http://tinyurl.com/yqgdt9
