I agree, I also think of Verizon when I think of Vcast. I was just saying
that the term Vidcast would be probably understood easily, and that the term
Vcast is partially why.

On 11/1/07, Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>   I don't know when I think of Vcast I think of verizon and their
> service not nessicary video podcasting or vlogging or videocast.
>
> Heath
> http://batmngeek.com
>
> --- In [email protected] <videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com>,
> "P. Dilly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > you are correct, a video blog sounds more like a genre of video
> podcasting.
> > I still think that vidcasts was the best name.
> > Verizon advertises Vcasts so heavy on the TV. that vidcasts would be
> > understood rather easily.
> >
> > On 11/1/07, Rupert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Yeah. I agree. It's the term that people understand.
> > > You yell vlog or video podcast, people go "Huh? What?"
> > > You yell "video blog", you got a panic on your hands on the
> fourth of
> > > July.
> > >
> > > However, David Howell was raising concerns the other day on
> Twitter
> > > about the connotations of the term. The general public knows the
> > > word, and they *think* they understand it...
> > >
> > > BUT they think solely in terms of Youtube, and the picture that
> comes
> > > into their mind when you say 'video blog' is that of a person
> droning
> > > into their webcam at great length about what they've done today.
> > > People aren't aware that video blogs and user-generated (sorry)
> > > online video comes in a million flavours. That's a barrier which
> > > stops intelligent and creative people being aware that there's
> > > challenging, varied and engaging new content online by independent
> > > vloggers, artists and filmmakers. At best, they know about the big
> > > name shows. And soon, they'll be spoonfed commercial 'channels'
> via
> > > things like Joost and Windows Media Center.
> > >
> > > As a community, we now need to put as much (if not more) effort
> into
> > > evangelising about the content as we have previously put into
> > > evangelising about the technology.
> > >
> > > Rupert
> > > http://twittervlog.tv/
> > > http://feeds.feedburner.com/twittervlog/
> > >
> > > On 1 Nov 2007, at 06:37, Mike Meiser wrote:
> > >
> > > I hadn't thought to check into this in a long while.
> > >
> > > video blog vs. vlog vs. video podcast
> > >
> > > Which terms is winning out?
> > >
> > > http://www.google.com/trends?q=video+podcast%2C+vlog%<http://www.google.com/trends?q=video+podcast%2C+vlog%25>
> 2C+video+blog%2C
> > > +videoblog&ctab=0&geo=all&date=all&sort=0
> > >
> > > Alternate tiny url:
> > >
> > > http://tinyurl.com/3b6j4u
> > >
> > > It would appear that "video blog" is THE clear term of choice,
> which
> > > makes me quite happy. The masses have pretty much spoken at this
> > > point. I think it's safe to say the dust is starting to settle and
> > > can't forsee anything changing the picture anytime soon.
> > >
> > > In fact the only thing more popular then "video blog" is simply
> > > "podcast", with an order of magnitude.
> > >
> > > http://www.google.com/trends?q<http://www.google.com/trends?
> q=video+blog%2C+podcast>
> > > =video+blog%2C+podcast<http://www.google.com/trends?q=video+blog%<http://www.google.com/trends?q=video+blog%25>
> 2C+podcast>
> > >
> > > On a side note it's interesting to note that while popularity the
> term
> > > podcast has obviously peaked the term videoblog continues to rise
> very
> > > steadily. Most interesting.
> > >
> > > I would think that podcast is the prefered term for audio specific
> > > media, but I could well be wrong, which brings me to my next
> point.
> > >
> > > **Google can't tell us what people thing these terms mean.**
> > >
> > > Do people think of podcasts as generally audio only?
> > >
> > > What percentage of these articles that are refering to "podcasts"
> are
> > > actually referring to video specific podcasts?
> > >
> > > When people here "video blog" what do they think?
> > >
> > > When people here "video blog" do they think simple "youtube"?
> > >
> > > or do they think "like a blog but instead of text primarily
> video"?
> > >
> > > Is blog itself yet a household term, or do people still think it
> means
> > > "to throw up"?
> > >
> > > And finally and most importantly... what is the state of RSS in
> all
> > > this?
> > >
> > > My guess is the vast majority will never know the term, RSS. Nor
> do
> > > they necissarily need to.
> > >
> > > They may understand two things: 1) subscribing, 2) syndication (if
> > > they make media).
> > >
> > > RSS is undisputeably and undeniably integral to this space. As 1)
> a
> > > subscription mechanism, 2) a serch mechanism, and 3) a syndication
> > > mechanism even though the vast majority of the public may not
> know it
> > > or even need to know it.
> > >
> > > What interests me though, is how far have we come in loosening
> media
> > > from the confines of the "web page" so it may flow freely beyond
> the
> > > boundries of the traditional web to set top boxes, portable
> devices,
> > > cell phones and such.
> > >
> > > How far have we really gotten in that big picture?
> > >
> > > What percentage of web originating video is viewed on a web page?
> > >
> > > What percentage is viewed on the web page it originated on, as
> opposed
> > > to through a syndication, reblog, or search site?
> > >
> > > Just some late night ramblings.
> > >
> > > -Mike
> > > mefeedia.com
> > > mmeiser.com/blog
> > > evilvlog.com
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Gary Leland
> >
> > www.PodcastPickle.com
> > www.PickleReviews.com
> > www.PickleMobile.com
> > www.PodcasterTree.com
> > www.PodcastJunk.com
> > www.PodcastInspector.com
> > www.DillDomains.com
> > www.MySalesAccount.com
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>  
>



-- 
Gary Leland

www.PodcastPickle.com
www.PickleReviews.com
www.PickleMobile.com
www.PodcasterTree.com
www.PodcastJunk.com
www.PodcastInspector.com
www.DillDomains.com
www.MySalesAccount.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to