No, Heath, you don't inflate your numbers when talking to People, only when
talking to the MSM!

Schlomo Rabinowitz
http://schlomo.tv - finally moving to wordpress
http://hatfactory.net - relaxed coworking
AIM:schlomochat


On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Heath <[email protected]> wrote:

>   Oh, you are supposed to inflate your numbers?!?!?.....well in that
> case hundreds of people subsribe to me and I make nickels every
> year....FTW!!!
>
> Heath
> http://heathparks.com
>
> --- In [email protected] <videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com>,
> "schlomo rabinowitz"
> <schl...@...> wrote:
> >
> > smpfilms/Williams was one of the first breakout stars as well as a
> > galvanizing force to bring other YouTubers together in real life.
> He
> > helped throw the first couple meatspace meetups.
> > He also takes promotional consideration every chance he gets. Even
> his
> > youtube channel of his cat is HUGE and keeps climbing the Youtube
> charts.
> >
> > He may be inflating numbers (who doesnt?), but I dont think
> he's "that" far
> > off the mark.
> >
> > Schlomo Rabinowitz
> > http://schlomo.tv - finally moving to wordpress
> > http://hatfactory.net - relaxed coworking
> > AIM:schlomochat
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Jay dedman <jay.ded...@...> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 12:54 PM, schlomo rabinowitz
> <schl...@...<schlomo%40gmail.com>>
> > > wrote:
> > > > Here's an article in today's NYT that probably doesnt tell you
> anything
> > > you
> > > > dont already know:
> > > >
> > > http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/11/business/media/11youtube.html?
> _r=2&ref=todayspaper
> > >
> > > One creator profiled in this article says:
> > > "Mr. Williams, who counts about 180,000 subscribers to his videos,
> > > said he was earning $17,000 to $20,000 a month via YouTube. "
> > >
> > > Could that possibly be true?
> > > that's over 200k a year.
> > >
> > > Jay
> > >
> > > --
> > > http://jaydedman.com
> > > 917 371 6790
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>  
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to