Yep, this is what I've been thinking as well. Thanks guys.

On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Seamus Byrne <sea...@thelancer.com.au>wrote:

> Best bet for cheap, effective results is definitely the 'double
> ender'. This is how TV used to do remote interviews before satellite
> was an effective solution. As ever, the occasional use of old school
> techniques will give you best results even in the Internet age.
>
> A lot of audio-only podcasters still use this technique - record at
> both ends, then combine in post. For good results with video,
> especially in HD, recording at each source is best. If you have any
> control over the quality of the broadband connection at both ends you
> might eventually get to first-rate results, but I'd be surprised if it
> didn't take quite some time to perfect.
>
> This is all based on an assumed desire to keep the video glitch-free.
> If you are not too concerned with glitches, some frame dropping, or
> high compression on the footage, a web solution may do the trick just
> fine. But if you want a crispy clean final product, shoot at each end.
>
> Séamus
> --
> http://byteside.com/
> http://twitter.com/seamus
>
>
> On 19/Oct/2009, at 2:45 AM, Adam Quirk wrote:
>
> > Looking for a solution for recording HD quality video from two
> > locations
> > simultaneously.
> > 1 guy in NYC studio
> > 1 guy in LA apartment
> >
> > The guys need to see each other and talk to each other live, and
> > both video
> > feeds need to be recorded in HD.
> >
> > Looked into OooVoo, which may be a good solution.
> >
> > Another thought was to just have them set up their HD cams and hit
> > record,
> > then use iChat to talk to each other and sync the video later.
> >
> > I'm open to all suggestions free or paid, PC or Mac.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Adam
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to