Ill clean up after the new Brit and take Nov 19.

Jay



On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Rupert Howe <rup...@twittervlog.tv> wrote:

>
>
> Given your impending exam, I figure even the mighty Mike Moon wouldn't
> be able to keep up a 30 day posting schedule... :)
>
>
> On 20-Oct-09, at 2:12 AM, mgmoon wrote:
>
> > I'll take November 22.
> > Sounds like a great idea.
> >
> > Mike
> > http://vlog.mikemoon.net
> >
> > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com <videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com>,
> Rupert Howe <rup...@...> wrote:
> > >
> > > It's that time of year again. I've reverted to calling it NaVloPoMo
> > > because after all the umming and ahhing about names and last year,
> > we
> > > came up with VloMo, which just didn't have the same ring to it.
> > >
> > > Given all the things going on in my life, there's absolutely no
> > way on
> > > God's Earth that I'm going to be able to make a video every day in
> > > November. And I know a lot of you will feel the same. Which got me
> > > thinking about ways to make it work.
> > >
> > > Of course, if you want to go ahead and do one video a day every
> > day in
> > > November, that's GREAT.
> > >
> > > But in addition, I thought maybe instead of 30 people all trying to
> > > make 30 videos, we could collaborate - 30 videobloggers each making
> > > just one video.
> > >
> > > Some of the best stuff that came out of the first Navlopomo in 2007
> > > was when people started responding to and remixing each others'
> > videos.
> > >
> > > So... How about this? You choose a day in November - and on that
> > day,
> > > you have to make a video inspired in some way by the previous day's
> > > video. A big linear game of videoblogging Consequences.
> > >
> > > What do you think? Are there 30 people out there who are up for
> > > this? If you're up for it, reply here.
> > >
> > > Rupert
> > > http://twittervlog.tv
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>  
>



-- 
http://ryanishungry.com
http://jaydedman.com
http://twitter.com/jaydedman
917 371 6790


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to