This was my instinct, too. Or at most two minutes. I've been doing this other project with one minute videos, and it works really well. You can fit quite a lot into a minute. What do other people think?
On 21-Oct-09, at 2:10 PM, proctorjen wrote: > Make it one minute! A good challenge, not too terribly long when all > put together. > > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, David King <davidleek...@...> > wrote: > > > > > I think around 3 minutes or less is good. Just make it good. > > > > > > > Agree - 3 min or less is a nice loose time constraint. Shorter > tends to be > > better, just enough to cover your idea. > > > > > I'm thinking that having one video inspire the next is enough of a > > > subject/theme constraint, that we don't need to introduce a > subject/ > > > theme at the beginning? > > > > agreed. I imagine a carp caviar vibe. everything fits. we'll all > push > > > each other. > > > > > > > It should be pretty interesting to see all the videos at once - > it'll be a > > type of loose story, or one just inspiration flowing into the next > (which > > will be cool too). > > > > I'm smiling, thinking of the childhood game of whispering a > phrase, passing > > it along 31 times, then seeing what comes out the other end :-) > Should be a > > great month! > > > > David Lee King > > davidleeking.com - blog > > davidleeking.com/etc - videoblog > > twitter | skype: davidleeking > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
