I am finding fewer and fewer reasons to avoid YouTube. YouTube's quality now is as good as Blip - better than their flvs, in fact - the new layout on their pages is good, and so are their sharing options.
Get round the bad bits by turning off comments and ratings, and add &showinfo=0 to your embed code to remove the ugly text title & star rating from the embedded player. I just made a 1 minute profile video for my wife's business, and embedded it on her home page as a YouTube player. It looks good. You can see it at: http://londonalexandertechnique.co.uk/ Previously I would have used Blip for this, but they and Vimeo now prohibit you from publishing any videos which promote businesses. I think I'm going to be using YouTube a lot more from now on, for everything. Rupert http://twittervlog.tv On 6 Feb 2010, at 00:08, Jay dedman wrote: > > They don't make you an HD flash version but blip has always > supported > > any size file you want to put up there. You can just add a 1080p > file > > (along with lots of other formats) when you upload. > > Thats why blip is good. They are almost completely format agnostic. > For instance, I use always blip when I need to post an mp3. > > Jay > > -- > http://ryanishungry.com > http://momentshowing.net > http://twitter.com/jaydedman > 917 371 6790 > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
