Call me old school, but I still publish my vlog in 320x240. For a couple of reasons. My old Flip shoots at 640x480 and at the native size its pretty crummy. Scaled to quarter screen it tightens up and cleans up the noise considerably.
Also theres nothing in my vlog that needs to be seen at HD resolution. Waste of bandwidth. My MacPro 8-core 3ghz with the ATI 3870 video card still chokes on flash video, and some HD content. blows my mind, I thought it would rock for web video playback. Kinda disappointed Adam Influxx Media Production --- In [email protected], "tom_a_sparks" <tom_a_spa...@...> wrote: > > the bad old days of dial-up when to view videos you had to download them or > watch streaming video at 160x120 > > cell/mobile phone record video at 320x240 > > 320x240 is still being used if the upload from you home-server is > substandarded like in australia :( > > tom > > --- In [email protected], Jay dedman <jay.dedman@> wrote: > > > > well, Vimeo just announced that it's added 1080p with ACCHD support > > (for Vimeo Plus members). > > http://www.studiodaily.com/blog/?p=2568 > > > > Youtube did this in the fall but it's not becoming common. I have a > > pretty decent mac and it can barely handle playback. But it was just 4 > > years ago when people complained of their computes choking on 320x240 > > videos. Bandwidth was slow and processing power limited. Just a matter > > of time before the groupBorgmind upgrades itself. > > > > Really really beautiful images at 1080p. > > > > Jay > > > > -- > > http://ryanishungry.com > > http://momentshowing.net > > http://twitter.com/jaydedman > > 917 371 6790 > > >
