That link to UCLA's news is incorrect. This should do it:
http://www.newsroom.ucla.edu/portal/ucla/campus-to-re-start-streaming-of-154601.aspx


Brown, Roger wrote:
Hi,

A link to the press release explaining UCLA's official position can be
seen here:

http://www.newsroom.ucla.edu/portal/ucla/campus-to-re-start-streaming-of-15
4601.aspx

Legal discussions of various aspects of the case can be found online from
Educause to Techdirt to the Sloan Consortium, as well as AIME's site.


- - 
Roger Brown
Manager
UCLA Instructional Media Collections & Services
46 Powell Library
Los Angeles, CA  90095-1517
office: 310-206-1248
fax: 310-206-5392
[email protected]





  
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 13:43:43 -0400
From: Jessica Rosner <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Videolib] UCLA case
To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Hey I am all for that. I think some of their documents are on the AIME
site.I can tell for a fact that 99% of the films they streamed did not
have
Public Performance Rights. Again the list of films they admitted to
streaming as of over a year ago was in the 1700 range and included tons of
Hollywood feature films, Foreign Films, Classic films and educational
documentaries. They did not specifically indicate if they had streamed all
those films in their entirety, but their claim was they had the right to
and
had clearly done it.

I would really love to hear someone from UCLA talk about the list of films
and how they did it.


On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 1:34 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:

    
Since I have not read all the legal pleadings, it would be helpful if
someone from UCLA could post a response to this list explaining exactly
what
they did do (and I am new to the list so I apologize if this was done
before).  It would be helpful to hear from someone at UCLA describe what
they streamed and how they did it (did they use a  proxy server so all
students on campus have access and from home or just for specific
courses
through course management software?  Did they stream titles in which
they
had paid for public performance rights or feature films?  How many
films did
they stream?).  Others on this list have made factual statements about
what
UCLA did, but I don't think I've heard from anyone at UCLA say what they
did.

Matthew

Matthew Wright
Head of Collection Development and Instructional Services
William S. Boyd School of Law
University of Nevada Las Vegas
4505 Maryland Parkway, Box 451080
Las Vegas, NV 89154-1080
(702) 895-2409; (702) 895-2410 (fax)


      

VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and distributors.
  

-- 
Susan Weber, Librarian
Langara College, 
100 West 49th Avenue, Vancouver, B.C.  V5Y 2Z6
Tel. 604-323-5533  email: [email protected]

VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.

Reply via email to