Gary, I am a little confused on the goal here re feature films. It is very, very unlikely that out of print feature film is remotely rare in the archival sense. For a variety of business or legal reasons a studio, filmmaker or in many cases foreign company has chosen not reissue it. What would be the point of "preserving" and old VHS ( or DVD) of an out of print title by say anyone from John Ford to Fassbinder? It could not circulate and the rights holder would in fact have far better materials.
As I have mentioned on more than one occasion I had a little "disagreement" with one of the heads of this project at ALA when he told a librarian that they should NOT attempt to contact a rights holder because they might object to copying a film they owned but was out of print. I would be rather surprised if this was your view. I am honestly a bit concerned by this project. I think some library collections may contain unique materials on film or things like BetaSp, but again it is awfully unlikely they would have truly unique material from most companies listed below. Are they planning to just make copies available of rare out o print titles because a rights holder most likely can't afford the cost of mastering and releasing the film? On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 1:43 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > hi guys > > Still plugging away on the Mellon grant I've been alluding to for a number > of months now (identifying out of distribution/at-risk materials in > library video collections) > > The task is going to be to develop a methodology to identify potential > candidates in library video collections. The project lead is NYU and the > investigators there are looking at scarce titles in the collections of > each of the three project partners (i.e. held by one library only) as a > test universe. > > I'm developing a considerably different approach. My sense is that scarce > titles aren't necessarily the titles that require most urgent attention > (primarily because they don't circulate much, and because a lot of these > tend to be stuff that wasn't commercially distributed in the first place). > Instead, I want to focus on a model that identifies broad groups of > commercially distributed titles that are likely to be out of distribution > in any format. Once done, I want to use circulation stat and/or anecdotal > info to make decisions about which to deal with first. ("Deal with" means > invoking Section 108 to digitize) > > I put a list of belly-up distributors and other suspects earlier. Here is > the list again with a few amendments. > > What have I forgotten? Who have I left out? What else should I be > thinking about? > > Thanks, as always, for your sage input! > > Gary > > > I. Identifying Vendors/Distributors know to be out of business > Using Berkeley’s OskiCat local OPAC and/or the Millennium ILS, identify > videos distributed by the following: > • American Poetry Archive > • Arthouse, Inc. > • Arthur Cantor Films > • Carousel Film and Video > • Coronet Film and Video > • CRM Films / McGraw-Hill Films, > • Drift Distribution > • Embassy Home Entertainment > • Films Incorporated > • Home Vision Cinema/Public Media Incorporated > • International Film Bureau > • International Media Resource Exchange / Latin American Video Archive > • InterNationes / Goethe Institute > • Learning Corporation of America > • Media for the Arts > • Media Guild > • Mystic Fire Video > • National Latino Communications Center (NLCC) > • University of California Center for Media and Independent Learning > > II. Identifying portions of currently in-business vendor catalogs likely > to be out of distribution > • ABC News / ABC Wide World of Learning > • PBS Home Video/PBS Video: films with release dates before 2005 > > • Annenberg/CPB Project pre-2050 > > • Time-Life Film and Video (pre-2000) > > • History Channel (pre-2005) > > • A&E Home Entertainment (pre-2005) > > III. Feature Films > List of US and foreign titles not currently available on DVD, assembled by > members of the VIDEOLIB listserv. > > Also: titles initially distributed by New Yorker Film and Video, and > Center for Cuban Studies > > > > Gary Handman > Director > Media Resources Center > Moffitt Library > UC Berkeley > > 510-643-8566 > [email protected] > http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/MRC > > "I have always preferred the reflection of life to life itself." > --Francois Truffaut > > > VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues > relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, > preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and > related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective > working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication > between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and > distributors. > -- Jessica Rosner Media Consultant 224-545-3897 (cell) 212-627-1785 (land line) [email protected] VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and distributors.
