Daniel Barrett writes:
> On June 19, 2025, Yeechang Lee wrote:
> >A way to avoid sending a message that mentions an attachment but does not 
> >have one. It is based on VM 8.2.0b and Emacs 23 (yes, really). I offer it to 
> >the community hoping that others will find it useful, and for feedback.
>
> Very interesting!
>
> May I suggest that "my-vm-check-for-attachment-regexp" should be a
> list of regexps instead of one regexp? For example,
>
>  (
>    "I've attached"
>    "see \(the \)?attachment"
>    "\(attached\|enclosed\|included\) \(file\|image\|picture\|document\)"
>  )
>
> A list like this is easier to read & maintain than a single regexp,
> and it may reduce false positives in messages like "Hi, I'm a
> psychologist who researches attachment" or "The hip bone is attached
> to the thigh bone."

Very interesting indeed... for the small minority of people on this
planet who writes messages in English. ;-)

In all seriousness:  I use some web mail portals that try to be smart
by implementing something similar.  I have never had any of their soft-
ware catch me not including an attachment.  However, several times they
managed to drive me screaming mad because I used a (German) trigger word
in a different context, and I had to close warning after warning before
I could send my message.

So I applaud your effort and your sentiment to share, but I would never
in a million years use something like that.

I love emacs-vm because it is great and I have been using it for more
than two decades, but I also hate it because it is riddled with bugs.
If I had the time, I would try to deal with the bugs...


Cheers -- Volker
-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Volker A. Brandt        Consulting and Support for Solaris-based Systems
Brandt & Brandt Computer GmbH               |   WWW: http://www.bb-c.de/
Am Wiesenpfad 6, 53340 Meckenheim, GERMANY  |         Email: [email protected]
HR: Amtsgericht Bonn, HRB 10513             | Mastodon: @[email protected]
Geschäftsführer: Rainer J.H. Brandt und Volker A. Brandt

Reply via email to