On Mon, 2 Jan 2023 14:17:43 -0500 Thomas Dickey <dic...@his.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 02, 2023 at 10:45:14AM +0000, Chris Green wrote: > > OK, restart, I think I now see a pattern in this. I completely > > removed and re-installed vile from the Ubuntu repositories on esprimo > > and it is now working correctly there. I had modified it there > > because of the issue a while ago with UTF8 characters. So the table > > is now as follows:- > > > > backup xubuntu 22.10 vile 9.8w colour OK, but not right > > bison Android 11 vile 9.8w colour OK, but not right > > caracal Debian 10 vile 9.8 no colour syntax > > cheddar Debian 10 vile 9.8t colour OK > > esprimo xubuntu 22.04 vile 9.8v colour OK > > isbd Ubuntu 20.04 vile 9.8t colour OK > > odin Debian 9 vile 9.8s colour OK > > pimedia Debian 11 vile 9.8u colour OK > > t470 xubuntu 22.10 vile 9.8w colour OK, but not right > > tsohost very old vile 9.8 no colour syntax > > > > > > This makes *much* more sense! :-) The systems with versions older > > than vile9.8w do syntax highlighting OK. The two systems where I > > built vile myself and installed as a user (no root access) don't do > > syntax highlighting but thati's almost certainly something I have > > missed out in the build and it's not so important there anyway. > > > > So, the question is why the syntax highlighting of vilemode for > > version 9.8w is messed up. It's not badly wrong, it gets the colour > > I made an incorrect bug-fix in 9.8w for vilemode, which is fixed in 9.8x > > This was the change (reverting it will fix the bug): > > @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ > > #define FLTSTACK_EXTRA int with_state; int with_active; > #define FltStack_WITH_STATE FLTSTACK_THIS.with_state > -#define FltStack_WITH_ACTIVE FLTSTACK_THIS.with_state > +#define FltStack_WITH_ACTIVE FLTSTACK_THIS.with_active > #include <fltstack.h> > > #if defined(_estruct_h) && !SMALLER > This is peculiar. In my 9.8w code (FreeBSD) this error is not present. > > of comments right throughout but gets confused about keyword colours > > and within some 'map' settings. As far as I can see on other file > > types (shell scripts, python, C) version 9.8w gets the highlighting > > correct so it does look like just an error in the vilemode > > highlighting. > > > > Has the vile-filt-filt file changed between 9.8v and 9.8w? > > > > -- > > Chris Green > > > > -- > Thomas E. Dickey <dic...@invisible-island.net> > https://invisible-island.net -- Gary Jennejohn
