On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
> On 11/30/06, Hugh Sasse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 Nov 2006, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
> >
> > > On 11/29/06, Hugh Sasse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > This was originally posted to vim@vim.org but I've not
> > > > had a reply. Maybe it's better posted here, anyway. This
> > > > is the concise form of the message. Longer versions are
> > > > in the archives, but I'll explain more if needed.
> > >
> > > Sorry about that. I don't read vim@vim.org because it's
> > > signal-to-noise ratio is just terrible.
> >
> > That's understandable. I'm the same with Ruby-Talk, but because there's
> > too much signal to read.
>
> Sadly that's what happened to me too.
>
> > > Also, which version of gcc are you using. I suspect that they changed
> > gcc (GCC) 4.1.0
> >
> > > the error message in the 4.X series, because I'm not getting this
> >
> > I think I saw it before.
>
> Yes, I recognize that message, but I'm not getting that anymore. With my gcc:
>
> % gcc --version | head -n 1
> gcc (GCC) 4.1.1 (Gentoo 4.1.1-r3)
I have 4.10 on Solaris9
gcc (GCC) 4.1.0
>
> I get
>
> a.c:11: error: redefinition of 'minimal_function'
> a.c:6: error: previous definition of 'minimal_function' was here
>
> which works fine with the old format, as the errors are completely
> separate (in the output that is).
>
> How are you calling gcc? I've done this with plain "gcc <file>" and
> "gcc -Wall <file>" and both give me the same result for this error.
In the original message to vim@vim.org I said
<quote>
This is being picked up correctly (I know because of introducing bugs
in it). But when I get results like:
/home/hgs/fsv/rawimage.c:97: multiple definition of `image_check_is_png'
image.o:/home/hgs/fsv/image.c:97: first defined here
vim tries to pickup a file called image.o:/home/hgs/fsv/image.c which
clearly doesn't exist.
</quote>
I was definitely getting this and it was pasted. Pulling the old versions
of the generator script out of RCS I cannot regenerate this message.
Using old versions of the makefile doesn't help restore this.
I suppose I'll have to give up on this now. I've updated sed, awk and grep
since then but I don't think those should come imto play.
>
> nikolai
>
Hugh
