On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
> On 11/30/06, Hugh Sasse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I was definitely getting this and it was pasted. Pulling the old versions
> > of the generator script out of RCS I cannot regenerate this message.
> > Using old versions of the makefile doesn't help restore this.
>
> Yeah, I remember getting these messages as well, but since the only
> case I could think of where this would happen is of the type you gave
> an example of I'm guessing that they changed the error message in a
> very recent version (4.1.1) and I'd prefer not complicating the
I've not used 4.1.1 on my systems yet. I've also updated binutils
in the past week, which may have made this go away.
> errorformat unnecessarily to conform to old versions of gcc. But
> perhaps I'm wrong in my reasoning? Anyway, I'll hold off on this
> until a working test-case can be produced.
OK. Given the way linewise matching is done, I'm now confused as to
the whole point of the %E %C %Z constructs now. Since one can't
put them into one expression (between commas), and as you said the
continuation line will be matched with the %f:%l:%m then I can't
be sure I used them correctly or what advantage they conveay.
>
> nikolai
>
Thank you,
Hugh
