Am Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:04:01 +0200 schrieb hermitte-GANU6spQydw: >> Optimal treatment is problematic. My guess is that the effort to make >> one great, combined tip out of the bits and pieces is probably not >> worth the effort, particularly at this stage. I would clean up each >> tip, and put in a reference to the others. I realise that the [count]gf >> tip would be pretty weak, but I think we should live with that now. > > Sounds good.
Yep. >> If we find a frequent need to refer to other similar tips, maybe we >> could do a template like Duplicate (e.g. see >> http://vim.wikia.com/wiki/VimTip1). The new template >> (Template:Related??) would be a much less prominent box. It would be at >> the end of the tip, and would occupy less space. It could say something >> like "Here are some related tips ...". >> >> Say tips 10, 20 and 30 are similar. We could put {{Related|10|20|30}} >> in each of those tips. That way, we don't have to put three different >> things (like {{Related|20|30}} in tip 10, etc). > > I like the idea, but I'm not sure about the "how". Often it's better to > give a little explanation of the why it is related, but I fail to see > how we would use the {{Related}} template to also give an explanation. Do we need the technical overhead? Wouldn't plain old [[links]] suffice? They are meant to relate things ... So one could write under heading ==references== VimTipXYZ is related to this one, but focusses more on topic ABC Seb. _______________________________________________ Vim-l mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/vim-l
