On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 17:56, Markus Heidelberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > björn, 15.11.2008: > [...] > > Avoiding these conflicts is more important than having nice commit logs. But > there should be a way to get both. Edward, do you know why the trunk branch > doesn't have nice commit logs and is there a way to get them in? Was this the > lack of merge tracking before svn version 1.5?
Because Bram doesn't like the idea of testing the most bleeding-edge features on the trunk. So currently, honestly speaking, trunk has no use at all. > [...] > > You fetch from the trunk branch, right? What kind of conflicts did arise? I > suspect mostly from the runtime files!? Any conflicts are possible. I'm not feeling surprised to that. Because there's no much relationship in technical layer between the trunk and the branches. The branches are not copied from the trunk. I'm not quite satisfied with the Subversion repository. However, I don't know what I can do to improve the current situation. > > [...] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
