> That's what I was thinking. However, it would certainly be easier to > code (and potentially to interact with) if the foldcolumn width would > just grow to accommodate the highest fold level. What do people > think...should 'foldcolumn' be used for the width of the fold column, > complete with a duplication of Vim's foldcolumn text, or should it > just grow as needed?
I think grow as needed. Ideally, in my eyes, it should not include it at all, though, if no foldcolumn is visible in Vim (i.e. foldcolumn=0). In that case, you need to resort to clicking the foldtext to open folds, and a double-click on text to close one, or something like that. > I think we should try to create a page that doesn't depend on the font > being used (beyond the fact that it should be fixed-width, of course). I agree. Stick to stuff in 7 bit ASCII, at least by default. Ben. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
