On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 9:21 PM, Steve Hall wrote: > > On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 03:05 +0100, Tony Mechelynck wrote: >> >> The only interest of Make_cyg.mak is to compile Vim binaries which >> don't need Cygwin to run, using the -mno-cygwin option of the >> Cygwin gcc compiler and the appropriate corresponding option of the >> linker. > >> If Cygwin drops the option, then you should not use Make_cyg.mak but >> switch (for instance) to MinGW and Make_ming.mak.
The option will be dropped. > Do these now fully support all gVim's features? I seem to recall > several years ago when I moved away from BCC that not all the usual > perl, python, tcl, mzscheme, ruby, ole, etc. features were. Well, the mingw compiler clearly supports them, and must be able to find and link the libraries, if you're able to build with these options using Make_cyg.mak - so, if Make_mingw.mak doesn't support these options, then it's only a matter of fixing up the Makefile (and possibly the README). ~Matt --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
