On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 03:05 +0100, Tony Mechelynck wrote: > > The only interest of Make_cyg.mak is to compile Vim binaries which > don't need Cygwin to run, using the -mno-cygwin option of the > Cygwin gcc compiler and the appropriate corresponding option of the > linker.
Hmm, I use only: make -f Make_cyg.mak GUI=yes all via the bash shell and end up with no dependencies. > If Cygwin drops the option, then you should not use Make_cyg.mak but > switch (for instance) to MinGW and Make_ming.mak. Do these now fully support all gVim's features? I seem to recall several years ago when I moved away from BCC that not all the usual perl, python, tcl, mzscheme, ruby, ole, etc. features were. -- Steve Hall [ digitect dancingpaper com ] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
