Ben Fritz wrote:
> On Monday, May 21, 2012 12:59:47 PM UTC-5, Thilo Six wrote:
> > > How about setting up an independent repo (not a clone) at
> > > http://vim-runtime.googlecode.com/
> > > Code license: GNU GPL v2
> >
> > runtimefiles are all (or better they all should be) licensed under Vim
> > licences.
>
> Yeah, but Google Code only has a few allowed licenses. Vim License is
> not one of them. Bram has dual-licensed Vim under GPL v2 and Vim
> License to allow putting it on Google Code.
The dual-license wasn't created for that reason :-).
I suppose it's OK to list the work as GPL, since it's the more
restrictive. Thus stays on the safe side.
--
The only way the average employee can speak to an executive is by taking a
second job as a golf caddie.
(Scott Adams - The Dilbert principle)
/// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org ///
\\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
