I see. I was thinking about it the wrong way then. On Thursday, March 7, 2013 5:35:24 PM UTC+1, Ben Fritz wrote: > > gUe suMMER > > :norm! gUe<CR> suMMER > > gU:norm! e<CR> suMMEr > > I'm not sure if this is documented (I couldn't find it mentioned > explicitly) but if I recall correctly, any : command in operator-pending > mode acts as an exclusive motion.
Yes, I did see that in the code for the colon command at normal.c#5398:
if (cap->oap->op_type != OP_NOP)
{
/* Using ":" as a movement is characterwise exclusive. */
cap->oap->motion_type = MCHAR;
cap->oap->inclusive = FALSE;
}
I added a note in the documentation and removed a now invalid item from
the todo list.
David Bürgin
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
doc-update-excl-motion.patch
Description: Binary data
