David Bürgin wrote: > I see. I was thinking about it the wrong way then. > > On Thursday, March 7, 2013 5:35:24 PM UTC+1, Ben Fritz wrote: > > > gUe suMMER > > > :norm! gUe<CR> suMMER > > > gU:norm! e<CR> suMMEr > > > > I'm not sure if this is documented (I couldn't find it mentioned > > explicitly) but if I recall correctly, any : command in operator-pending > > mode acts as an exclusive motion. > > Yes, I did see that in the code for the colon command at normal.c#5398: > > if (cap->oap->op_type != OP_NOP) > { > /* Using ":" as a movement is characterwise exclusive. */ > cap->oap->motion_type = MCHAR; > cap->oap->inclusive = FALSE; > } > > I added a note in the documentation and removed a now invalid item from > the todo list.
Thanks! -- hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict: 29. Your phone bill comes to your doorstep in a box. /// Bram Moolenaar -- b...@moolenaar.net -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ /// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ \\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org /// \\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org /// -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.