> (char_u *)_(“") is *translated* empty string casted to unsigned char. What do > you need translation of an empty string for?
If it is NULL, vim prints “back to original” message. > I am against this patch though as I do want to receive these messages. This > should be fixed by adding appropriate flag (such as s//e) to whatever method > that is giving these messages if you are sure there are no ways to use other > methods (e.g. :silent). Links you gave does not show the code which is giving > these messages, and without them discussion of proper ways to fix the problem > is pointless. The fact that YCM upstream said it is a vim bug does not > actually make this a vim bug. > On second thought, I agree that using **verbose** to suppress this message is inappropriate. Maybe a proper solution is to add a separate flag to temporally disable this message. > By the way, FAQ you referenced talks about "User defined completion <bla bla> > back at original" messages and you are silencing "Pattern not found" ones. I > do not understand why. > -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
