On Di, 05 Nov 2013, zhaocai wrote:
> > I am against this patch though as I do want to receive these messages. This
> > should be fixed by adding appropriate flag (such as s//e) to whatever
> > method that is giving these messages if you are sure there are no ways to
> > use other methods (e.g. :silent). Links you gave does not show the code
> > which is giving these messages, and without them discussion of proper ways
> > to fix the problem is pointless. The fact that YCM upstream said it is a
> > vim bug does not actually make this a vim bug.
> >
> On second thought, I agree that using **verbose** to suppress this message is
> inappropriate. Maybe a proper solution is to add a separate flag to
> temporally disable this message.
What is wrong with using silent?
> > By the way, FAQ you referenced talks about "User defined completion <bla
> > bla> back at original" messages and you are silencing "Pattern not found"
> > ones. I do not understand why.
What about this question?
regards,
Christian
--
Die Menschen glauben sich nach einem zu richten, indes sich der eine
nach ihnen richtet.
-- Jean Paul
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
