On Thursday, January 2, 2014 8:33:42 AM UTC-6, [email protected] wrote: > Hello, and happy new year! > > > > > I've been thinking again about *why* VAM is viml only again. > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > If we'd use ruby gems it would be harder to declare package sources > > > in your .vimrc and be done. > > > > Yes indeed. > > Please, stay clear of anything that is not viml -- or the system commands + > git, svn, ... > > I don't have ruby nor python on most of the windows boxes where I install > vim. And I need/want to have a plugin manager that supports dependencies on > these machines. > > > > VAM choice was a good one regarding the viml-only restriction. >
One reason I chose Pathogen was that my workplace blocks all git, Hg, and SVN access that leaves our internal network. I'm forced to manually download zip archives to update my plugins. Anything using git directly without alternate methods is not an option for me. -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
