On 31/07/2014 16:40, Paul Moore wrote:
On 31 July 2014 16:05, Paul Moore <[email protected]> wrote:
On 31 July 2014 15:51, Mike Williams <[email protected]> wrote:
Bram's nod AFAIK. I have been using it for the last 18 months and have had
no problems with it. I don't know if anyone else, other than the original
developer, has been using it. Can't see any obvious problem rolling it out
since people have to actively use it at the moment.
Yeah, I guess what I really meant was is there any way to get Bram to
review/approve it? Maybe this thread will remind him about it...
Actually, I also see the rendering bugs referred to in the thread
there. Maybe there's still some work needed on that patch.
Is this the cut'n'paste issue? Do you have test data? TIA
On the other hand my proposal of removing use of ETO_IGNORELANGUAGE
seems minimal and works without issues, as far as I can see. So I'd
say implement that for the short term, and the full DirectX patch once
the rendering issues are ironed out (the DirectX rendering is nicer
than the default, so I do think it's worth using).
As mentioned elsewhere this likely affects right-left rendering in gVim :(
Mike
--
What's brown and sticky? A stick!
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
