John Little wrote: > On Tuesday, August 19, 2014 11:24:22 AM UTC+12, tux. wrote: > > Is there any reason VIM_VERSION_BUILD is never increased beyond 280? > > in version.h > #define VIM_VERSION_BUILD 280 > > This also looks odd: > #define VIM_VERSION_BUILD_BCD 0x118 > > unless "stringified" somehow, it's equal to 280. If it's really intended to > be binary coded decimal, it would be 0x280, I'd have thought.
Those numbers are for major and minor releases, not patchlevels. -- A day without sunshine is like, well, night. /// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ /// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ \\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org /// \\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org /// -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
