On 19/08/14 16:17, Tux wrote:
Am 19. August 2014 16:13:36 MESZ, schrieb Bram Moolenaar <[email protected]>:
Those numbers are for major and minor releases, not patchlevels.
Why does 7.4.410 still identify as 7.4.280 then? I guess in most OSs it doesn't
matter, but Windows (for example) shows the executable version in some places
which might be confusing to some.
Just wondering.
Bram just said it was for major/minor, not patchlevel: so just 7.4; the
.410 isn't relevant. How 7.4 gives 280 is beyond me. Well, 7 times 4
times 10 happens to give 280 but I doubt that that's the answer.
The Windows-specific a.b.c.d version number is built somewhere else, in
a Windows-specific file.
Best regards,
Tony.
--
hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict:
145. You e-mail your boss, informing him you'll be late.
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
