Ramel Eshed wrote:
> On Thursday, August 11, 2016 at 3:08:01 AM UTC+3, Ramel Eshed wrote:
> > On Thursday, August 11, 2016 at 2:19:38 AM UTC+3, Tony Mechelynck wrote:
> > > There are other factors which are right there in the help:
> > > - job_start() returns a Job object and doesn't wait for the job to finish
> > > - system() waits for the external command to finish and returns its
> > > full stdout output as a string.
> > >
> > > I don't know Vim job control really well, but I seem to understand
> > > that in order to compare system() timing and job control timing you
> > > would have to set up callbacks to gather any output from the channel,
> > > and a callback to be called when the job ends (it may still write to
> > > stdout after it exits), and measure the time from just before
> > > job_start() to just after making sure that all output has been
> > > collected and that the job has ended.
> > >
> > > You might even, for testing purposes, try to write a System() user
> > > function to invoke the argument as a job and return its output as a
> > > string, with the disadvantage that you would completely lose job
> > > control asynchronism. But it would allow you a better comparison,
> > > namely between old-fashioned system() and this new job-control-based
> > > System().
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Tony.
> >
> > That's exactly what I've did:
> >
> > func! Job()
> > let s:rt = reltime()
> > let g:output = []
> > let g:job = job_start(['/bin/sh', '-c', 'cat ' . expand('%')],
> > {'out_cb': function('s:out_cb'), 'close_cb': function('s:close_cb')})
> > endfunc
> >
> > func! s:out_cb(channel, msg)
> > call add(g:output, a:msg)
> > endfunc
> >
> > func! s:close_cb(channel)
> > echo reltimestr(reltime(s:rt))
> > "echo g:output
> > endfunc
> >
> > " compare with:
> >
> > func! System()
> > let s:rt = reltime()
> > let g:output = systemlist('cat ' . expand('%'))
> > echo reltimestr(reltime(s:rt))
> > endfunc
> >
> > """""""""""""
> > I checked it now on my Ubuntu at home - I still see the difference but now
> > both are much faster so even the system() delay is not noticeable. Any idea
> > what could cause the delay on my RHEL?
> >
> > BTW, if I remove the comment from the 'echo g:output' line in close_cb()
> > the message is not displayed (actually, it depends on which command is
> > running. for the 'cat' command above -there is no message).
>
> Hi Bram,
>
> Is it possible to make system() work the same way job_start (with a
> shell) does? As I mentioned, I get a noticeable delay with system()
> which I don't get when using job_start(['/bin/sh'...).
Not sure if there is anything to improve. Would require finding out why
it's slower and whether that can be fixed.
You could add channel log commands in the code in various places to see
what happens.
--
hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict:
76. Your ISP regards you as a business partner rather than as a customer.
/// Bram Moolenaar -- b...@moolenaar.net -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org ///
\\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
