On Sunday, August 28, 2016 at 11:36:33 PM UTC+3, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> Ramel Eshed wrote:
>
> > Of course, I've measured the time from job_start to close_cb. You can see
> > this comparison in the example I've attached earlier in this thread.
>
> Hmm, it's possible that detecting that the other end closed the pipe
> happens much sooner than detecting that the child process has ended.
> If that is the case I don't think there is a way around that.
>
>
> --
> hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict:
> 96. On Super Bowl Sunday, you followed the score by going to the
> Yahoo main page instead of turning on the TV.
>
> /// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
> /// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
> \\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org ///
> \\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
Well, I didn't think something like this could work but it did:
func! System(cmd)
let out = []
let job = job_start(['/bin/sh', '-c', a:cmd],
\ {'out_cb': {c, msg -> add(out, msg)}})
let ch = job_getchannel(job)
while ch_status(ch) != 'closed'
sleep 10m
endwhile
return out
endfunc
Maybe it should be done the same way in the C system() implementation...
Thanks anyway,
Ramel
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
