On 2016-10-26, 22:23 GMT, Tony Mechelynck wrote: > Don't make the too frequent error to believe that everyone > else, or at least most of them, has the same preferences as > you. The fact that we hardly ever see a post about whether or > not vimballs are the way to go does not necessarily mean that > everyone dislikes them the way you do. On the contrary, > I would intrpret that silence as meaning that the current > state of affairs is OK for most people, because if it weren't > they would complain. I hardly ever see such a complaint, yours > is a "once in a blue moon" thing.
I don’t think this is the case. I have been following a lot of vim-related news and communications in the last year or more, and I have found a lot of plugins which are just uploaded to vim.org/scripts/ (mostly tarballs or zip archives), and a lot of plugins which are in a git repo (99.9% cases in GitHub). This is the first vimball I see in a long long time. And you are wrong if you except complains ... featuretitis doesn’t represent itself by complaints from users. Only by the rotting code, and emerging (security and other) bugs. Matěj -- https://matej.ceplovi.cz/blog/, Jabber: [email protected] GPG Finger: 3C76 A027 CA45 AD70 98B5 BC1D 7920 5802 880B C9D8 The state is the great fictitious entity by which everyone seeks to live at the expense of everyone else. -- Frederick Bastiat -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
