On 2016-10-27, 11:58 GMT, Tony Mechelynck wrote: > Ohhh, so that's what you mean. Well, here is another try: Not > being imitated, or not being a copycat himself, don't > necessarily mean that Dr. Chip is wrong, especially with Vim, > which prides himself about allowing the users to obtain the > same results by different means.
I don't even know whether Dr. Chip was wrong when he invented vimballs. His crystal ball was obviously a bit murky so he haven’t expected git (and particularly GitHub) typhoon. Either because of that or for whatever other reason vimballs really are not that widespread as was expected when they became part of vim. I believe it is time to accept the reality and move on. Matěj -- https://matej.ceplovi.cz/blog/, Jabber: [email protected] GPG Finger: 3C76 A027 CA45 AD70 98B5 BC1D 7920 5802 880B C9D8 Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity. -- Napoleon Bonaparte (or many other people to whom this quote is ascribed) -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
