Bram Moolenaar <[email protected]> wrote: > I currently think that the behavior to close-by-default only when no > command argument is passed is the best solution. This assumes that the > user intentionally ends the shell, which seems like a safe assumption.
Right now, if I do ":terminal ++close" then exit the terminal, its output is gone and I get no chance to see it anymore. It seems that it's a bit dangerous, especially if it becomes the default i.e without the ++close flag. But I understand that when user close the shell, he often meant to also close the terminal window. How about closing the terminal window but keep the buffer in memory? (i.e. as if we did CTRL-N in the terminal, followed by :q) So we'd still get a chance to reopen but buffer, using :ls to find the buffer name or number. I think that this would be my preference, but I have not used the terminal enough to be sure what works best. Regards Dominique -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
